LIBYA CONQUERED IN SILENCE Tony Cartalucci Infowars site translation Gianluca Freda Lock the Middle East and China and Russia will block and start to dominate the world. The current ongoing instability in the Middle East is a desperate move aimed at eliminating the bearing Middle East, to isolate the two superpowers on the rise and compel them to accept their place in a unipolar world order that has New York and London at its center.
Libya is the latest in a long line of Middle Eastern nations that have been destabilized and forced to deal with a Western-backed regime change. With the corporate media to popular intent to engage in incredible propaganda actions, with the army of bloggers in the U.S. State Department to coordinate the riots on the ground, with a number close to zero for news from the country endorsed by some confirmation, it seems that the great North African country is intended to be dismembered in total silence.
Unlike Egypt, Mohamed El Baradei where , trustee of the American International Crisis Group, spoke daily with international reporters, and where Al Jazeera television coverage provided 24 hours on 24, Libya is practically a black hole. The media will just reflect the sentiments of bloggers say "Libyans" and protesters at the scene. The quotes that punctuate the gossipy reports released by the BBC and Al Jazeera and the litany of talking without content, indicate that this "revolution" will be fed into the public in the most bogus and inconsistent ways. Unfortunately, because during a crisis we all depend on the reliability of the corporate media, and since the BBC itself is an important member of the synod corporate globalist Chatham House, you can not trust anyone and we are forced to remain in the confusion and uncertainty. Too many people, however, will fall again victims of the thin veil of legitimacy offered by the subtle images of violence and well-rigged appeared in widely circulated media.
The last article of the BBC on the speech with which Seif al-Islam [the son of Gaddafi, NdT] addressed the nation, gives us a wonderful example of how the media tend to force the limited information come from Libya to satisfy a default account that is beneficial to the interests of the global cartel. In his address to the nation, Seif al-Islam and foreigners accused opposition groups of trying to distort the Libya, said the foreign press is grossly exaggerating the reactions of the government against protesters and compared the riots to a " Facebook revolution "similar to the Egyptian .
Although the BBC admits that "it is difficult to verify the information from Libya," in the text of the article refers to the speech by Seif al-Islam as a "delusional proclaims television." In the sidebar you can read a commentary on the BBC's Jon Leyne propagandist, who has dealt with the "march and zillion zillions of men" in Egypt, telling readers that he felt that "all of Egypt" had gathered in Tahrir Square. The highest estimates of the participants to the event range from a minimum of 50,000 and a maximum of no more than 100,000 people (0.1% of the Egyptian population). With regard to the speech of Seif al-Islam, Leyne says the following, producing a stunt devoid of professionalism, which is the only thing we can expect from the BBC:
"It 's been one of strangest political speeches I have ever witnessed. [Seif] was completely and hopelessly separated from the reality of what is happening in his country. To put it bluntly, many Libyans seemed only stammer an incomprehensible something completely meaningless for them. The idea that somehow they can sit down and start a national dialogue with a government that has hired foreign mercenaries to fire upon them, is laughable. "
Leyne What to give the right to speak on behalf of the Libyan people on a crisis that its own network defines hard to bring , Thus admitting its own "separation from reality" is something that is beyond comprehension, unless, of course, this is pure propaganda with the purpose of discrediting the speech. The thing that the mainstream media and Seif al-Islam seem to agree, is the fact that the city of Benghazi, east of Libya, it would fall into the hands of the rebels who would take possession of arms and tanks. The attitude of the BBC and Al Jazeera to be called "massacre" against the government's reaction arsonists, looters, vandals and now the dangerous gangs armed with heavy weapons, is somewhat disingenuous and similar to the description of these same networks gave that in May 2010 crowds invaded the streets of Bangkok .
If Seif al-Islam accepts that the security forces have made mistakes, the possibility that the violence has been incited, even by the demonstrators or their foreign handlers can not be completely ruled out. The U.S. think tank Brookings Institute devoted an entire chapter of his report on Iran systems to trigger revolutions and military techniques to exploit against Iranian security forces, they were sure of being able to organize the revolution without resorting to interventions U.S. military, undercover or not. In Bangkok, in 2010, protesters who sympathized with the deposed prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, supported by the U.S., were incited by a shadow-militant group led by well-chosen leader. They, April 10, 2010, instigated a bloodbath in an attempt to shift the blame on the government and force him to step aside. The explosion of violence and 91 deaths that followed because of clashes between Thai security forces and these militant groups, are now the basis on which the lawyer Robert Amsterdam globalist are looking for, almost a year later, to indict the Thai government.
Since the mainstream media are clearly unreliable, it is up to us to try to understand what is really going on. The most substantial evidence that not everything is as it seems and that foreign hands are interfering in the internal affairs of these nations, is the fact that hired propagandists like the BBC and Al Jazeera take a stand in favor of one party rather than doing their work, which should be to report the facts objectively.
If plans against Libya appear somewhat ambiguous, we have already pointed out beyond any doubt that the protests Egypt and Tunisia are in all respects the result of manipulation west, where even the symbols used by the protesters have been "recycled" from a previous and now openly acknowledged American operation in Serbia. The signs are all there, and - in the absence of objective information - you must use caution, do extensive research and, no doubt, never again to trust our media to widely disseminated.
